Andrew Donnellan writes:
> On 06/11/15 10:43, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> If it's unused *and* broken then we should just remove it.
>
> Following some discussion with Ian and Vaibhav, we'd like to keep it at
> this stage - while there are no current AFUs which write to AFU config
> space, it wo
On 06/11/15 10:43, Michael Ellerman wrote:
If it's unused *and* broken then we should just remove it.
Following some discussion with Ian and Vaibhav, we'd like to keep it at
this stage - while there are no current AFUs which write to AFU config
space, it would be reasonable for an AFU develop
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 10:05 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan writes:
>
> > When writing a value to config space, cxl_pcie_write_config() calls
> > cxl_pcie_config_info() to obtain a mask and shift value, shifts the new
> > value accordingly, then uses the mask to combine the shift
On 06/11/15 10:05, Daniel Axtens wrote:
Given that there are no current users of this function, does this need
to go to stable? Does it actually fix a real (as opposed to theoretical)
bug?
I tagged it for stable on mpe's request - I'm not fussed either way.
Andrew
--
Andrew Donnellan
On Fri, 2015-11-06 at 10:05 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Andrew Donnellan writes:
>
> > When writing a value to config space, cxl_pcie_write_config() calls
> > cxl_pcie_config_info() to obtain a mask and shift value, shifts the
> > new
> > value accordingly, then uses the mask to combine the shi
Andrew Donnellan writes:
> When writing a value to config space, cxl_pcie_write_config() calls
> cxl_pcie_config_info() to obtain a mask and shift value, shifts the new
> value accordingly, then uses the mask to combine the shifted value with the
> existing value at the address as part of a read-
Acked-by: Ian Munsie
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
When writing a value to config space, cxl_pcie_write_config() calls
cxl_pcie_config_info() to obtain a mask and shift value, shifts the new
value accordingly, then uses the mask to combine the shifted value with the
existing value at the address as part of a read-modify-write pattern.
Currently, w