On 27/04/17 11:09, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
Patch looks good, thanks!
It doesn't apply cleanly on the 'next' tree due to the capi2
patchset
though, so you should probably rebase on that tree. The bits have
changed a bit on PSL9, but the approach still works (error type
reported
in the first byte,
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 11:23 +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
> Le 26/04/2017 à 08:40, Alastair D'Silva a écrit :
> > From: Alastair D'Silva
> >
> > In some situations, a faulty AFU slice may create an interrupt
> > storm,
> > rendering the machine unusable. Since these interrupts are
> > informat
Le 26/04/2017 à 08:40, Alastair D'Silva a écrit :
From: Alastair D'Silva
In some situations, a faulty AFU slice may create an interrupt storm,
rendering the machine unusable. Since these interrupts are informational
only, present the interrupt once, then mask it off to prevent it from
being r
On 26/04/17 16:40, Alastair D'Silva wrote:
From: Alastair D'Silva
In some situations, a faulty AFU slice may create an interrupt storm,
rendering the machine unusable. Since these interrupts are informational
only, present the interrupt once, then mask it off to prevent it from
being retriggere
From: Alastair D'Silva
In some situations, a faulty AFU slice may create an interrupt storm,
rendering the machine unusable. Since these interrupts are informational
only, present the interrupt once, then mask it off to prevent it from
being retriggered until the card is reset.
Signed-off-by: Al
