On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 09:17 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
> Le 03/11/2015 00:48, Ian Munsie a écrit :
> >
> > Looks like we managed to introduce the same bug twice (d'oh!), so we
> > should probably split this into two separate patches:
> >
> > The bug in file.c has existed forever so the fix for
Le 03/11/2015 00:48, Ian Munsie a écrit :
Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-11-02 11:53:45 +1100:
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 13:39 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
When the cxl driver creates a context, it stores the pid of the
calling task, incrementing the reference count on the str
On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:48 +1100, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-11-02 11:53:45 +1100:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 13:39 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
> >
> > > When the cxl driver creates a context, it stores the pid of the
> > > calling task, incrementing the
Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-11-02 11:53:45 +1100:
> On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 13:39 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
> > When the cxl driver creates a context, it stores the pid of the
> > calling task, incrementing the reference count on the struct
> > pid. Current code mistakenly
On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 13:39 +0100, Frederic Barrat wrote:
> When the cxl driver creates a context, it stores the pid of the
> calling task, incrementing the reference count on the struct
> pid. Current code mistakenly increments the reference count twice,
> once through get_task_pid(), once throug
Acked-by: Ian Munsie
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On 29/10/15 23:39, Frederic Barrat wrote:
When the cxl driver creates a context, it stores the pid of the
calling task, incrementing the reference count on the struct
pid. Current code mistakenly increments the reference count twice,
once through get_task_pid(), once through get_pid(). The refere
When the cxl driver creates a context, it stores the pid of the
calling task, incrementing the reference count on the struct
pid. Current code mistakenly increments the reference count twice,
once through get_task_pid(), once through get_pid(). The reference
count is only decremented once on detach
