"Naveen N. Rao" writes:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> On 18-02-21 07:52 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
>>> On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>> ..
Looks good to me, but I am not able to apply this patch. There seems to be
whitespace damage.
>>>
>>> Here (attached) is a clean copy.
>>
>> Again
Daniel Borkmann writes:
> On 02/21/2018 01:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Mark Lord writes:
>>
>>> I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform,
>>> and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF
>>> even though the interpreter was working fine.
>>>
>>> The issue was t
Mark Lord wrote:
On 18-02-21 07:52 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
..
Looks good to me, but I am not able to apply this patch. There seems to be
whitespace damage.
Here (attached) is a clean copy.
Again, this time with the commit message included!
Thanks.
On 18-02-21 07:52 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
> On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
..
>> Looks good to me, but I am not able to apply this patch. There seems to be
>> whitespace damage.
>
> Here (attached) is a clean copy.
Again, this time with the commit message included!
I am using SECCOMP t
On 18-02-21 03:35 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>> I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform,
>> and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF
>> even though the interpreter was working fine.
>>
>> The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instr
Mark Lord wrote:
I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform,
and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF
even though the interpreter was working fine.
The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instructions
used by SECCOMP, so here is a patch to enable JIT
On 02/21/2018 01:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Mark Lord writes:
>
>> I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform,
>> and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF
>> even though the interpreter was working fine.
>>
>> The issue was that the compiler was missing one of
Mark Lord writes:
> I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform,
> and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF
> even though the interpreter was working fine.
>
> The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instructions
> used by SECCOMP, so here is a patch t
I am using SECCOMP to filter syscalls on a ppc32 platform,
and noticed that the JIT compiler was failing on the BPF
even though the interpreter was working fine.
The issue was that the compiler was missing one of the instructions
used by SECCOMP, so here is a patch to enable JIT for that instructi
