On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:48:01PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>
>
> David Gibson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:28:42PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>>
>>> David Gibson wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:50:40PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
> +
David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:28:42PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:50:40PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
[snip]
+ const u_int32_t *propval;
+ u_int32_t addrcells = 0, sizecells = 0;
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 05:28:42PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> David Gibson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:50:40PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
[snip]
>>> + const u_int32_t *propval;
>>> + u_int32_t addrcells = 0, sizecells = 0;
>>>int len;
>>>
>>>
David Gibson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:50:40PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
This patch modifes ofpart.c so the total size of NAND FLASH
and the size of an individual partition can exceed 4GiB. It does so
by decoding the "reg" property based on the values of "#address-cells"
and "#si
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 01:50:40PM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
> This patch modifes ofpart.c so the total size of NAND FLASH
> and the size of an individual partition can exceed 4GiB. It does so
> by decoding the "reg" property based on the values of "#address-cells"
> and "#size-cells" in the par
A revised version of the patch, addressing some points that Segher
identified, will be issued soon.
So if you want to review the patch as submitted, please be aware that
some stylistic things have already been fixed (u64 instead of u_int64_t
etc, use of of_read_number(), removal of fallback code
This patch modifes ofpart.c so the total size of NAND FLASH
and the size of an individual partition can exceed 4GiB. It does so
by decoding the "reg" property based on the values of "#address-cells"
and "#size-cells" in the parent node, thus allowing the base address
and size to be 64-bit numbers
