Hi Michael,
Thanks a lot for your reply! :-)
I have found two interesting lines in the device tree:
compatible "pasemi,nemo"
model "pasemi,nemo"
What do you think?
Please find attached the output of `lsprop /proc/device-tree`.
Thanks,
Christian
On 22.12.2017 12:19, Michael
Christian Zigotzky writes:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Sorry I'm bothering you again. Is this small out of tree init routine in
> the Nemo patch? I haven't get an answer from Darren yet and I didn't
> found the small out of tree init routine in the Nemo patch. Please find
> attached the Nemo patch. Maybe
I mean: I haven't gotten an answer from Darren yet. Sorry because of my
English. I am still learning.
-- Christian
On 22 December 2017 at 10:57AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
>
> Sorry I'm bothering you again. Is this small out of tree init routine
in the Nemo patch? I haven't get a
Hi Bjorn,
Sorry I'm bothering you again. Is this small out of tree init routine in
the Nemo patch? I haven't get an answer from Darren yet and I didn't
found the small out of tree init routine in the Nemo patch. Please find
attached the Nemo patch. Maybe you can find this small out of tree ini
On 04 December 2017 at 12:40PM, Darren Stevens wrote:
> Hello Bjorn
>
> Firstly sorry for not being able to join in this discussion, I have been
> moving house and only got my X1000 set up again yesterday..
>
> On 30/11/2017, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> I *think* something like the patch below should
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 09:04:51AM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 09 December 2017 at 7:03PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > On 08 December 2017 at 12:59PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >
> > >> Darren's idea of doing it at the same time you tweak the SB600 "relax
> > >> pci-e" bit is ideal be
On 09 December 2017 at 7:03PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 08 December 2017 at 12:59PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> >> Darren's idea of doing it at the same time you tweak the SB600 "relax
> >> pci-e" bit is ideal because then the two pieces are obviously
> >> connected and it wouldn't affect
On 08 December 2017 at 12:59PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
>> Darren's idea of doing it at the same time you tweak the SB600 "relax
>> pci-e" bit is ideal because then the two pieces are obviously
>> connected and it wouldn't affect any other systems at all.
>
> Yes that would be ideal. That patch
Bjorn Helgaas writes:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 11:57:03PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Christian Zigotzky writes:
>> ...
>> >
>> > Hi Olof,
>> >
>> > Many thanks for your patch! :-) The RC2 of kernel 4.15 boots without any
>> > problems on my P.A. Semi Nemo board (A-EON AmigaOne X1000). I
Olof Johansson writes:
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Olof Johansson writes:
>>>
>>> The below patch, together with Bjorn's, should do it. Christian, can you
>>> test
>>> and report back?
>>>
>>> I'm guessing it won't do any harm to set this on non-X1000 platforms.
On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 11:57:03PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Christian Zigotzky writes:
> ...
> >
> > Hi Olof,
> >
> > Many thanks for your patch! :-) The RC2 of kernel 4.15 boots without any
> > problems on my P.A. Semi Nemo board (A-EON AmigaOne X1000). I don’t need
> > the additional b
On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Olof Johansson writes:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>>> On 02 December 2017 at 00:27AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for testing that. I'll merge a similar patch for v4.16.
>>> >
>>>
Christian Zigotzky writes:
...
>
> Hi Olof,
>
> Many thanks for your patch! :-) The RC2 of kernel 4.15 boots without any
> problems on my P.A. Semi Nemo board (A-EON AmigaOne X1000). I don’t need
> the additional boot argument 'pci=pcie_scan_all' anymore.
>
> Is it possible to merge it via the p
Olof Johansson writes:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>> On 02 December 2017 at 00:27AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks for testing that. I'll merge a similar patch for v4.16.
>> >
>> > I don't think using "pci=pcie_scan_all" is really an acceptabl
On 06 December 2017 at 09:37AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 03 December 2017 at 10:43AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> >
> > On 3. Dec 2017, at 00:02, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>
> >> Typo, should be ';', not ':'. I obviously didn't even try
compiling this. :)
> >>
> >>
> >> -Olof
> >
> > Hi Ol
On 03 December 2017 10:43AM, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> On 3. Dec 2017, at 00:02, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>>
>>> The below patch, together with Bjorn's, should do it. Christian,
can you test
>>> and report back?
>>>
>>> I'm guessin
On 3. Dec 2017, at 00:02, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>> The below patch, together with Bjorn's, should do it. Christian, can you test
>> and report back?
>>
>> I'm guessing it won't do any harm to set this on non-X1000 platforms. My
>>
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>> On 02 December 2017 at 00:27AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks for testing that. I'll merge a similar patch for v4.16.
>> >
>> > I don't think using "pci=pcie_scan
On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 01:54:41PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 02 December 2017 at 00:27AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for testing that. I'll merge a similar patch for v4.16.
> >
> > I don't think using "pci=pcie_scan_all" is really an acceptable
> > long-term answer for you,
On 02 December 2017 at 00:27AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Thanks for testing that. I'll merge a similar patch for v4.16.
I don't think using "pci=pcie_scan_all" is really an acceptable
long-term answer for you, though. Is there some way we can identify
at run-time whether we're on a Nemo system?
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:08:46PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 30.11.2017 23:42, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > 00:11.0 claims to be a PCIe Root Port leading to [bus 05-06]. That
> > means there's a Link (presumably this A-Link II Express thing), and the
> > downstream end of the Link *shou
On 30.11.2017 23:42, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> 00:11.0 claims to be a PCIe Root Port leading to [bus 05-06]. That
> means there's a Link (presumably this A-Link II Express thing), and the
> downstream end of the Link *should* be a PCIe Upstream Port on bus 05,
> but no such device is visible. I su
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:39:36AM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> On 29 November 2017 at 11:34PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Christian Zigotzky
> >> Thank you for your answer. I have tried to boot the kernel 4.15
> >> RC1 (built without the patch above) with the b
On 29 November 2017 at 11:34PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Christian Zigotzky
>> Hi Bjorn,
>>
>> Thank you for your answer. I have tried to boot the kernel 4.15 RC1
(built
>> without the patch above) with the boot argument "pci=pcie_scan_all" but
>> without any succe
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Christian Zigotzky
wrote:
> On 29 November 2017 at 8:46PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Christian Zigotzky
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 23 November 2017 at 2:31PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for your pat
On 29 November 2017 at 8:46PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Christian Zigotzky
wrote:
On 23 November 2017 at 2:31PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for your patch.
Christian Zigotzky writes:
Hi All,
Just a small patch for the P.A. Semi Nemo board:
-
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Christian Zigotzky
wrote:
> On 23 November 2017 2:31PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Thanks for your patch.
>>
>> Christian Zigotzky writes:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Just a small patch for the P.A. Semi Nemo board:
>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>> diff -r
On 23 November 2017 2:31PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for your patch.
Christian Zigotzky writes:
Hi All,
Just a small patch for the P.A. Semi Nemo board:
-
diff -rupN a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c 2017-11-16 08:18:40.5040120
Hi Christian,
Thanks for your patch.
Christian Zigotzky writes:
> Hi All,
>
> Just a small patch for the P.A. Semi Nemo board:
>
> -
>
> diff -rupN a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c 2017-11-16 08:18:40.504012010 +0100
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c 20
Hi All,
Just a small patch for the P.A. Semi Nemo board:
-
diff -rupN a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c 2017-11-16 08:18:40.504012010 +0100
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c 2017-11-16 08:17:22.044368405 +0100
@@ -2219,6 +2219,8 @@ static int only_one_child
30 matches
Mail list logo
