Re: [PATCH] Revert "KVM: Don't accept obviously wrong gsi values via KVM_IRQFD"

2017-09-18 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 16.09.2017 22:12, Jan H. Schönherr wrote: > This reverts commit 36ae3c0a36b7456432fedce38ae2f7bd3e01a563. > > The commit broke compilation on !CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING. Also, > there may be cases with CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING, where larger > gsi values make sense. > > As the commit was m

Re: [PATCH] Revert "KVM: Don't accept obviously wrong gsi values via KVM_IRQFD"

2017-09-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 18/09/2017 08:44, Michael Ellerman wrote: > "Jan H. Schönherr" writes: > >> This reverts commit 36ae3c0a36b7456432fedce38ae2f7bd3e01a563. >> >> The commit broke compilation on !CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING. Also, >> there may be cases with CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING, where larger >> gsi values

Re: [PATCH] Revert "KVM: Don't accept obviously wrong gsi values via KVM_IRQFD"

2017-09-17 Thread Michael Ellerman
"Jan H. Schönherr" writes: > This reverts commit 36ae3c0a36b7456432fedce38ae2f7bd3e01a563. > > The commit broke compilation on !CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING. Also, > there may be cases with CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING, where larger > gsi values make sense. > > As the commit was meant as an early i

[PATCH] Revert "KVM: Don't accept obviously wrong gsi values via KVM_IRQFD"

2017-09-16 Thread Jan H . Schönherr
This reverts commit 36ae3c0a36b7456432fedce38ae2f7bd3e01a563. The commit broke compilation on !CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING. Also, there may be cases with CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING, where larger gsi values make sense. As the commit was meant as an early indicator to user space that something is