Timur Tabi wrote:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch doesn't change that for cpm2, since port.dev is never
initialized. :-P
I don't initialize port->dev in the UCC UART driver,
Yes you do -- check line 1403.
-Scott
___
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch doesn't change that for cpm2, since port.dev is never
> initialized. :-P
I don't initialize port->dev in the UCC UART driver, but it's still
non-zero, so why isn't it initialized in the CPM UART driver?
(P.S. Beck
On Sep 8, 2008, at 2:56 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
Becky Bruce wrote:
We're currently passing NULL, and really shouldn't be.
This patch doesn't change that for cpm2, since port.dev is never
initialized. :-P
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_c
Becky Bruce wrote:
We're currently passing NULL, and really shouldn't be.
This patch doesn't change that for cpm2, since port.dev is never
initialized. :-P
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |6 +++---
drivers/serial/ucc_uart.c
We're currently passing NULL, and really shouldn't be.
Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_cpm2.c |6 +++---
drivers/serial/ucc_uart.c |4 ++--
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/serial/cpm_u
