On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Jason Gunthorpe
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:50:38PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:30 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> > NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
>> > OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NO
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:50:38PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:30 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
> > OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
> > entire nodes depending on
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:30 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
> OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
> entire nodes depending on various environment parameters.
>
> of_scan_flat_dt already handles NOP more g
NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
entire nodes depending on various environment parameters.
of_scan_flat_dt already handles NOP more generally..
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe
---
arch/powerpc/kernel
