* Josh Boyer | 2009-05-05 19:09:19 [-0400]:
>On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:24:04PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
>>On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Benjamin Krill wrote:
>
>That is quite true. Although resending the patch just for that seems overkill.
>The maintainer can edit the summary rather easily.
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 02:24:04PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
>On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Benjamin Krill wrote:
>> The receive interrupt routine checks the wrong register if the
>> receive fifo is empty. Further an explicit interrupt acknowledge
>> write is introduced. In some circumstances ano
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Benjamin Krill wrote:
> The receive interrupt routine checks the wrong register if the
> receive fifo is empty. Further an explicit interrupt acknowledge
> write is introduced. In some circumstances another interrupt was
> issued.
The one-line summary of your patch
The receive interrupt routine checks the wrong register if the
receive fifo is empty. Further an explicit interrupt acknowledge
write is introduced. In some circumstances another interrupt was
issued.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Krill
---
drivers/serial/nwpserial.c |4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 in
