Re: [PATCH] Fix FSL BookE machine check reporting

2007-08-03 Thread Kumar Gala
On Aug 3, 2007, at 4:18 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Becky Bruce writes: > >> Reserved MCSR bits on FSL BookE parts may have spurious values >> when mcheck occurs. Mask these off when printing the MCSR to >> avoid confusion. Also, get rid of the MCSR_GL_CI bit defined >> for e500 - this bit does

Re: [PATCH] Fix FSL BookE machine check reporting

2007-08-03 Thread Paul Mackerras
Becky Bruce writes: > Reserved MCSR bits on FSL BookE parts may have spurious values > when mcheck occurs. Mask these off when printing the MCSR to > avoid confusion. Also, get rid of the MCSR_GL_CI bit defined > for e500 - this bit doesn't actually have any meaning. Is this needed for 2.6.23?

[PATCH] Fix FSL BookE machine check reporting

2007-08-02 Thread Becky Bruce
Reserved MCSR bits on FSL BookE parts may have spurious values when mcheck occurs. Mask these off when printing the MCSR to avoid confusion. Also, get rid of the MCSR_GL_CI bit defined for e500 - this bit doesn't actually have any meaning. Signed-off-by: Becky Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch