On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:34:45 +1000
Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
> > >
> >
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > Ben/Paulus,
> >
> > As fa
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:08:04 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
>
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 05:56 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > Ben/Paulus,
> >
> > As f
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 22:50 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Ben/Paulus,
>
> As far as I can tell this is correct. Having sysdev/dcr.c in the arch/ppc
> bui
From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dcr.c is an arch/powerpc only thing.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Ben/Paulus,
As far as I can tell this is correct. Having sysdev/dcr.c in the arch/ppc
build spits out warnings. Grep doesn't show anything in arch/ppc that
is using