On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 22:57 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:49 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> > Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:56:40 +1000
> >
> > > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:01 +100
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:49 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:56:40 +1000
>
> > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:01 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> > We don't actually want kmemleak to t
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:56:40 +1000
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:01 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we
>> > pass min_count as 0. However t
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 17:56 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:01 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > > We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we
> > > pass min_count as 0. However te
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:01 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we
> > pass min_count as 0. However telling kmemleak about lmb allocations
> > allows it to scan that memory fo
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 13:01 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we
> pass min_count as 0. However telling kmemleak about lmb allocations
> allows it to scan that memory for pointers to other memory that is
> tracked by kmemleak, ie. slab
We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we
pass min_count as 0. However telling kmemleak about lmb allocations
allows it to scan that memory for pointers to other memory that is
tracked by kmemleak, ie. slab allocations etc.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
lib/lmb.c
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 15:05 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we
> pass min_count as 0. However telling kmemleak about lmb allocations
> allows it to scan that memory for pointers to other memory that is
> tracked by kmemleak, ie. slab
We don't actually want kmemleak to track the lmb allocations, so we
pass min_count as 0. However telling kmemleak about lmb allocations
allows it to scan that memory for pointers to other memory that is
tracked by kmemleak, ie. slab allocations etc.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
---
lib/lmb.c
