On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 03:12:56PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary?
We haven't done it so far for x86 & arm, so for now at least, just keeping
them in drivers/cpufreq/ should be sufficient.
> Should I resumbit it, or there will
On Friday 17 June 2011 13:12:56 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > I think new cpufreq drivers should live in drivers/cpufreq, not in arch/.
> > We've
> > started moving other drivers away from arch/x86 and arch/arm already.
>
> What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary?
drivers/
Hello,
On 6/17/11, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2011 10:49:16 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
>> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
>> boxes with all pmac-dependant features r
On Friday 17 June 2011 10:49:16 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
> boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
> applied.
>
> Signe
Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
applied.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_64.S
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 14:28 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
> boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
> applied.
No spe
On 6/4/11, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 13:00 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> On 5/30/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > On 5/21/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> >> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 13:00 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> On 5/30/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 5/21/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> >> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
> >> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufre
On 5/30/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 5/21/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
>> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
>> boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed
Hello,
On 5/21/11, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
> boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
> applied.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dm
Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
applied.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_64.S
11 matches
Mail list logo