On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 17:57:31 +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Refactoring in commit a50b7926d015 ("ASoC: fsl_sai: implement 1:1
> bclk:mclk ratio support") led to the bypass never happening
> as (ratio = 1) was caught in the existing if (ratio & 1) continue;
> check. The correct check sequence instead i
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:58 PM Ahmad Fatoum
wrote:
> Refactoring in commit a50b7926d015 ("ASoC: fsl_sai: implement 1:1
> bclk:mclk ratio support") led to the bypass never happening
> as (ratio = 1) was caught in the existing if (ratio & 1) continue;
> check. The correct check sequence instead is
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 05:57:31PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Refactoring in commit a50b7926d015 ("ASoC: fsl_sai: implement 1:1
> bclk:mclk ratio support") led to the bypass never happening
> as (ratio = 1) was caught in the existing if (ratio & 1) continue;
> check. The correct check sequence in
Refactoring in commit a50b7926d015 ("ASoC: fsl_sai: implement 1:1
bclk:mclk ratio support") led to the bypass never happening
as (ratio = 1) was caught in the existing if (ratio & 1) continue;
check. The correct check sequence instead is:
- skip all ratios lower than one and higher than 512
- sk
