On 3/31/23 16:34, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:26:33PM +, Emil Abildgaard Svendsen wrote:
>> On 3/31/23 04:55, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
>
>>> There are different requirements for this slot width. Some need physical
>>> width,
>>> Some need format width. We need to be careful abou
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:26:33PM +, Emil Abildgaard Svendsen wrote:
> On 3/31/23 04:55, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > There are different requirements for this slot width. Some need physical
> > width,
> > Some need format width. We need to be careful about change here.
> I might be wrong but sh
On 3/31/23 04:55, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:30 PM Emil Abildgaard Svendsen <
> e...@bang-olufsen.dk> wrote:
>
>> Slot width should follow the physical width of the format instead of the
>> data width.
>>
>> This is needed for formats like SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE where physic
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 4:30 PM Emil Abildgaard Svendsen <
e...@bang-olufsen.dk> wrote:
> Slot width should follow the physical width of the format instead of the
> data width.
>
> This is needed for formats like SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE where physical
> width is 32 and data width is 24. By using t
Slot width should follow the physical width of the format instead of the
data width.
This is needed for formats like SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE where physical
width is 32 and data width is 24. By using the physical width, data
won't get misaligned.
Signed-off-by: Emil Svendsen
---
sound/soc/fsl/fs
