Both calls to of_find_node_by_name() and of_get_next_child() return a
node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicidly
decremented here after the last usage. As we are assured to have a
refcounted np either from the initial
of_find_node_by_name(NULL, name); or from the of_get_ne
On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:07:42 +0200,
Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>
> Both calls to of_find_node_by_name() and of_get_next_child() return a
> node pointer with refcount incremented thus it must be explicidly
> decremented here after the last usage. As we are assured to have a
> refcounted np either