On 04/18/2013 07:38 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Since you are only reading one long you shouldn't need to check the
> update count and loop, you will always see a consistent value. The
> system call version of time() just does an unprotected load for example.
Fixed.
> With the above change and w
Hi Adhemerval,
> This patch implement the time syscall as vDSO. I have a glibc patch
> to use it as IFUNC (as latest gettimeofday patch). Below the perf
> numbers:
>
> Baseline PPC32: 380 nsec
> Baseline PPC64: 352 nsec
> vdso PPC32: 20 nsec
> vdso PPC64: 20 nsec
Very nice speedup. On
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:05:50AM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 03:21 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:55:31PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> This patch implement the time syscall as vDSO. I have a glibc patch
> >> to use it as
On 04/05/2013 03:21 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:55:31PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch implement the time syscall as vDSO. I have a glibc patch
>> to use it as IFUNC (as latest gettimeofday patch). Below the perf
>> numbers:
>>
>> Baseline
On 04/05/2013 03:21 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:55:31PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch implement the time syscall as vDSO. I have a glibc patch
>> to use it as IFUNC (as latest gettimeofday patch). Below the perf
>> numbers:
>>
>> Baseline
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:55:31PM -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch implement the time syscall as vDSO. I have a glibc patch
> to use it as IFUNC (as latest gettimeofday patch). Below the perf
> numbers:
>
> Baseline PPC32: 380 nsec
> Baseline PPC64: 352 nsec
> vdso PPC32
Hi Benjamin,
Any objection or request about this patch?
On 20-03-2013 02:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:55 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> I focused on 64 bit kernel, do I need to provide a scheme for 32 bits
>> as well?
> You did provide both 32 and 64-bit VDSO
Hi all,
Just sending a ping about this patch.
On 21-03-2013 10:40, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> On 20-03-2013 02:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:55 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>> I focused on 64 bit kernel, do I need to provide a scheme for 32 bits
>>> as well?
On 20-03-2013 02:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:55 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> I focused on 64 bit kernel, do I need to provide a scheme for 32 bits
>> as well?
> You did provide both 32 and 64-bit VDSO implementations so 32-bit
> kernels should be covered.
In
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 16:55 -0300, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
> I focused on 64 bit kernel, do I need to provide a scheme for 32 bits
> as well?
You did provide both 32 and 64-bit VDSO implementations so 32-bit
kernels should be covered.
Cheers,
Ben.
__
Hi all,
This patch implement the time syscall as vDSO. I have a glibc patch
to use it as IFUNC (as latest gettimeofday patch). Below the perf
numbers:
Baseline PPC32: 380 nsec
Baseline PPC64: 352 nsec
vdso PPC32: 20 nsec
vdso PPC64: 20 nsec
I focused on 64 bit kernel, do I need to prov
11 matches
Mail list logo