Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Remove bdflush syscall stub

2019-05-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Cyril Hrubis: > Hi! >> > I've tested the patch on i386. Before the patch calling bdflush() with >> > attempt to tune a variable returned 0 and after the patch the syscall >> > fails with EINVAL. >> >> Should be ENOSYS, doesn't it? > > My bad, the LTP syscall wrapper handles ENOSYS and produces

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Remove bdflush syscall stub

2019-05-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Mai 28 2019, Cyril Hrubis wrote: > I've tested the patch on i386. Before the patch calling bdflush() with > attempt to tune a variable returned 0 and after the patch the syscall > fails with EINVAL. Should be ENOSYS, doesn't it? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fin