Re: [PATCH] [Powerpc V2] fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values

2007-10-29 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 13:32 -0500, Will Schmidt wrote: > [Powerpc V2] fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values > > Now that we have 1TB segment size support, we need to be using the > GET_ESID_1T macro when comparing ESID values for pc,stack, and > unmapped_base within switch_slb().A new hel

Re: [PATCH] [Powerpc V2] fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values

2007-10-29 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Will, Just a trivial comment ... On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:32:19 -0500 Will Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +static inline int esids_match(unsigned long addr1, unsigned long addr2) > +{ > + int esid_1t_count; > + > + /* System is not 1T segment size capable. */ > + if (!cpu_has

[PATCH] [Powerpc V2] fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values

2007-10-29 Thread Will Schmidt
[Powerpc V2] fix switch_slb handling of 1T ESID values Now that we have 1TB segment size support, we need to be using the GET_ESID_1T macro when comparing ESID values for pc,stack, and unmapped_base within switch_slb().A new helper function called esids_match() contains the logic for deciding