On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 09:38:23AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >I wonder what are the symptoms if microcode is at fault? According
> >to errata description, hang isn't something I should get on the
> >transmit attempt.
>
> Well, if the microcode fails, you'll never know.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> I wonder what are the symptoms if microcode is at fault? According
> to errata description, hang isn't something I should get on the
> transmit attempt.
Well, if the microcode fails, you'll never know. I tried to explain the
need for a unified microcode validation mecha
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 07:29:44PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 02:44:46PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> > Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> >
> > >Yup. I've seen it, thanks. I'm going to test it as well. ;-)
> >
> > If they work for you, please let Kumar know.
>
> Unfortunately t
On Tue, Dec 25, 2007 at 02:44:46PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >Yup. I've seen it, thanks. I'm going to test it as well. ;-)
>
> If they work for you, please let Kumar know.
Unfortunately they don't.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# echo abc > /dev/ttyQE0
And hang. No interrupts.
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Yup. I've seen it, thanks. I'm going to test it as well. ;-)
If they work for you, please let Kumar know.
> MPC8360E, Rev: 21. Are you aware of any known issues on this chip
> regarding UCC serials?
Yep. You need a microcode upload. My patches describe everything.
___
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> You need "bus-frequency" here too
>
> Hm..
>
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-December/048388.html
>
> ^^ David Gibson suggested to get rid of it.
It looks to me like he's just suggesting that we rename it to
clock-frequency. That may be a better nam
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:28:31PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >+[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >+#address-cells = <1>;
> >+#size-cells = <1>;
> >+compatible = "fsl,qe";
> >+ranges = <0 0xe010 0x0010>;
> >+reg
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 09:25:56PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >2. QE SCCs (slow UCCs, used as an UARTs)
>
> I a posted a driver that provides this support, I'm just waiting for
> Kumar to apply it.
Yup. I've seen it, thanks. I'm going to test it as well. ;-)
> What r
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "fsl,qe";
> + ranges = <0 0xe010 0x0010>;
> + reg = <0xe010 0x480>;
> + /* filled by u-boot */
>
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> 2. QE SCCs (slow UCCs, used as an UARTs)
I a posted a driver that provides this support, I'm just waiting for
Kumar to apply it.
What revision of the 8360 does this board use?
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 23:23:09 +0300 Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +static struct of_device_id mpc836x_rdk_ids[] = {
Please make this __initdata.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgp6hCLGmk8wd.pgp
Description: PGP
This is new board made by Freescale Semiconductor Inc. and
Logic Product Development.
Currently supported:
1. UEC1,2,7,4
2. I2C
3. SPI
4. NS16550 serial
5. PCI and miniPCI
6. Intel NOR StrataFlash X16 64Mbit PC28F640P30T85
Not supported so far:
1. StMICRO NAND512W3A2BN6E, 512 Mbit (supported with
12 matches
Mail list logo
