On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:09:24 +1100 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Grant Likely writes:
>
> > Any comments/concerns on this patch?
>
> I'm about to throw it into my tree.
Fine by me.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr
Grant Likely writes:
> Any comments/concerns on this patch?
I'm about to throw it into my tree.
Paul.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Ben, Paul, Stephen,
Any comments/concerns on this patch? I've got a series of patches
which I haven't published yet as they depend on this one. If this
patch doesn't go in then I need to rework the series, in which case
I'd like to know sooner rather than later so that I've got time for
the rewo
From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Similar to of_find_compatible_node(), of_find_matching_node() and
for_each_matching_node() allow you to iterate over the device tree
looking for specific nodes except that it accepts a of_device_id
table instead of strings.
This patch also moves of_match_nod