On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 18:11 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> I can't think at the moment, it's Saturday, but is there some way we
> could just make it a wrapper macro, so we don't need to redefine - and
> keep in sync - all the different init call types?
>
> So the usage would look something like
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 17:24 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The machine initcall macros allow initcalls to be registered which
> test machine_is() before executing the initcall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Ben, is this the
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 17:24 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The machine initcall macros allow initcalls to be registered which
> test machine_is() before executing the initcall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> Ben, is this th
From: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The machine initcall macros allow initcalls to be registered which
test machine_is() before executing the initcall.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Ben, is this the sort of thing you're considering?
g.
include/asm-powerpc/machdep.h |
