On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:16:53 +0100
Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The 405EX and 405EXr are identical exept that the 2nd PCIe and the
> > > 2nd EMAC interfaces are missing.
> >
> > Does ppc405ex_pciex_core_init need to grow some logic to detect 405ex
> > from 405exr and return the co
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Since the 4xx PCIe driver checks for 405ex compatibility, the
> > PCIe interface was not detected as it is currently defined as
> > "405exr" compatible. This patch changes it to "405ex".
> >
> > The 405EX and 405EXr are identical exept that the 2
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:45:58 +0100
Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the 4xx PCIe driver checks for 405ex compatibility, the
> PCIe interface was not detected as it is currently defined as
> "405exr" compatible. This patch changes it to "405ex".
>
> The 405EX and 405EXr are identica
Since the 4xx PCIe driver checks for 405ex compatibility, the
PCIe interface was not detected as it is currently defined as
"405exr" compatible. This patch changes it to "405ex".
The 405EX and 405EXr are identical exept that the 2nd PCIe and the
2nd EMAC interfaces are missing.
Signed-off-by: Ste
