> Case when ffs return will never arise.This scenario is
> already been discussed
> on linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org. Please see below explanation:
> sata_fsl_error_intr() is called during device error.The
> mentioned scenario
> will never comes. It can be observed via code:-
> if (
When a single device error is detected, the device under the error is indicated
by the error bit set in the DER. There is a one to one mapping between register
bit and devices on Port multiplier(PMP) i.e. bit 0 represents PMP device 0 and
bit 1 represents PMP device 1 etc.
Current implementation t
PATCH][v2] driver/FSL SATA:Fix wrong Device Error Register
> usage
>
> On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 15:27 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> > When a single device error is detected, the device under the error is
> > indicated by the error bit set in the DER. There is a one to one
> >
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 15:27 +0530, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote:
> When a single device error is detected, the device under the error is
> indicated
> by the error bit set in the DER. There is a one to one mapping between
> register
> bit and devices on Port multiplier(PMP) i.e. bit 0 represents PMP
When a single device error is detected, the device under the error is indicated
by the error bit set in the DER. There is a one to one mapping between register
bit and devices on Port multiplier(PMP) i.e. bit 0 represents PMP device 0 and
bit 1 represents PMP device 1 etc.
Current implementation t
