On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 07:28 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> So how could we solve this issue now? Apply my current patch? Any
> other suggestions?
Well, we probably need your current patch, but I'm not 100% it's enough.
We need to check for example that the vDSO code for 32-bit isn't going
to go
On Thursday 08 October 2009 22:12:56 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > We noticed that recent kernels didn't boot on our 1GHz Canyonlands
460EX
> > boards anymore. As it seems, patch 8d165db1 [powerpc: Improve
> > decrementer accuracy] intro
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> We noticed that recent kernels didn't boot on our 1GHz Canyonlands 460EX
> boards anymore. As it seems, patch 8d165db1 [powerpc: Improve
> decrementer accuracy] introduced this problem. The routine div_sc()
> overflows with shift = 32 resulti
We noticed that recent kernels didn't boot on our 1GHz Canyonlands 460EX
boards anymore. As it seems, patch 8d165db1 [powerpc: Improve
decrementer accuracy] introduced this problem. The routine div_sc()
overflows with shift = 32 resulting in this incorrect setup:
time_init: decrementer frequency =
