In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> The one who needs this patch (CPU card vendor 1):
>
> MPC5200CVR400B, M62C REV 1, QCW0723T
>
> The CPUs who do not need this patch (CPU card vendor 2):
>
> SPC5200CBV400B, M62C REV 1, QAG0610C
> MPC5200CVR400B, M62C REV 1, QAJ0613F
This is all Rev.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Is it really exactly the same CPU revision? My guess is that
> > one is rev. B and the other one is older...
>
> The processor on my board which needs the BSDIS-patch has following
> label:
> MPC5200CVR400B
And the one which doesn't need it is a ..
Wolfgang,
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 01:20, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Is anybody out there with more MPC5200B experience? Can someone tell me
> > why some MPC5200B are need this patch and others not? We have two
> > different systems here (cards from di
Hello Wolfgang,
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. Januar 2008 01:21
> An: Juergen Beisert
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; Mehlan, Markus (Ritter Elektronik)
> Betreff: Re: [MPC5200] problem running F
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Is anybody out there with more MPC5200B experience? Can someone tell me why
> some MPC5200B are need this patch and others not? We have two different
> systems here (cards from different vendors) with the same processor, one
> needs this BSDIS-patch and
er Elektronik)
> > Betreff: Re: [MPC5200] problem running FEC and ATA
> >
> > Markus,
> >
> > On Monday 21 January 2008 08:10, Mehlan, Markus (Ritter
> >
> > Elektronik) wrote:
> > > i have the same problem with the fec driver. See my posting
Hello Juergen,
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Juergen Beisert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. Januar 2008 09:58
> An: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Cc: Mehlan, Markus (Ritter Elektronik)
> Betreff: Re: [MPC5200] problem running FEC and ATA
>
>
Markus,
On Monday 21 January 2008 08:10, Mehlan, Markus (Ritter Elektronik) wrote:
> i have the same problem with the fec driver. See my posting
> at
> http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2008-January/029466.html
>
> Arnon, have you already fixed the FEC problem?
Can you check this?
ht
Hello all,
i have the same problem with the fec driver. See my posting
at
http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded/2008-January/029466.html
Arnon, have you already fixed the FEC problem?
Thanks and regards,
Markus.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Li
On Sunday 16 December 2007 18:28, Arnon Kaufman wrote:
> Robert Schwebel wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:24:34PM +0200, Arnon Kaufman wrote:
>>> does any one succeed running a functional FEC and ATA (pata) running
>>> together?
>>
>> Yes, we do, on the phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny; you can check our
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:28:40PM +0200, Arnon Kaufman wrote:
> Robert Schwebel wrote:
> >On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:24:34PM +0200, Arnon Kaufman wrote:
> >>does any one succeed running a functional FEC and ATA (pata) running
> >>together?
> >
> >Yes, we do, on the phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny; you can c
Robert Schwebel wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:24:34PM +0200, Arnon Kaufman wrote:
>> does any one succeed running a functional FEC and ATA (pata) running
>> together?
>
> Yes, we do, on the phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny; you can check our patches here:
> http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/bsp/phytec/d
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 03:24:34PM +0200, Arnon Kaufman wrote:
> does any one succeed running a functional FEC and ATA (pata) running
> together?
Yes, we do, on the phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny; you can check our patches here:
http://www.pengutronix.de/oselas/bsp/phytec/download/phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny/
W
does any one succeed running a functional FEC and ATA (pata) running
together ?
If so which version (2.6.x...) and with which architecture (powerpc or
ppc)?.
The machine I'm working on based on v2.6.21-rc6 and another one based on
v2.6.24-rc1, both configured with ARCH=powerpc.
my FEC introduc
14 matches
Mail list logo