On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:33 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:32 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala
>
On Jul 22, 2009, at 11:32 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala
wrote:
On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala
wrote:
I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
On Jul 21, 2009,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala
>> wrote:
>> I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
>>
>>
>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>>
>>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
>
> The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC
>> architecture (ppc440)
>>
>>
>> msgctl101 B[ cut
On Jul 22, 2009, at 10:38 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Kumar Gala
wrote:
I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC
architec
I'm not seeing any BUG* in traps.c @ line 904.
On Jul 21, 2009, at 4:33 AM, srikanth krishnakar wrote:
The LTP test case msgctl10.c fails on linux-2.6.29.6 for PowerPC
architecture (ppc440)
msgctl101 B[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c:904!
O
