On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 17:56 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> At present there are multiple places where invalid node number is
> encoded
> as -1. Even though implicitly understood it is always better to have
> macros
> in there. Replace these open encodings for an invalid node number
> with the
>
On 11/26/18 10:56 AM, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 17:56 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> At present there are multiple places where invalid node number is
>> encoded
>> as -1. Even though implicitly understood it is always better to have
>> macros
>> in there. Replace these open e
