On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 14:21 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> IMO moving of handling ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s to generic code
> under
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC seems to be cleaner approach than weak definitation.
>
> As per my understanding each thread is a different logical cpu.
> Each logical cp
On 14/08/13 13:53, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 08/14/2013 05:01 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> On 13/08/13 22:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 19:29 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
I don't understand completely the use of ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s and
its
On 14/08/13 12:37, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:01 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> Yes this doesn't cover the historical "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s",
>> for
>> which we can have PPC specific wrapper above the generic one i.e. get
>> the cpu node and then parse fo
On 08/14/2013 05:01 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> On 13/08/13 22:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 19:29 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>> I don't understand completely the use of ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s and
>>> its implications on generic of_get_cpu_node impl
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:01 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> Yes this doesn't cover the historical "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s",
> for
> which we can have PPC specific wrapper above the generic one i.e. get
> the cpu node and then parse for thread id under custom property.
A wrapper is wrong.
On 13/08/13 22:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 19:29 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> I don't understand completely the use of ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s and
>> its implications on generic of_get_cpu_node implementation.
>> I see the PPC specific definition of of_get
On 13/08/13 20:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 01:44:23 PM Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
>> wrote:
>>> Adding PowerPC list
>>>
>>> On 13/08/13 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:27:47 PM Sude
On 13/08/13 19:37, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 08/13/2013 05:40 PM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> Adding PowerPC list
>>
>> On 13/08/13 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:27:47 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
The following changes since commit
d4e4ab86bcba5a7
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 21:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> I'd go for 1 above personally.
Yuck no. Two functions with roughly the same name and the same purpose
differing only by an underscore just because one can't take 5mn to
reconcile the new one with the old one ? No way.
Ben.
___
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 13:44 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is up to Rafael if he is willing/able to rebase his tree, but I
> would drop this series until this is sorted out. I think the new
> common function should be and can be generalized to work for powerpc.
> It would need to make reg property
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 19:29 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> I don't understand completely the use of ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s and
> its implications on generic of_get_cpu_node implementation.
> I see the PPC specific definition of of_get_cpu_node uses thread id only
> in 2 instances. Based
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> There seems to be conflict in the new function "of_get_cpu_node" added.
> PowerPC also defines the same function name. Further microblaze and
> openrisc declares it(can be removed) but doesn't define it.
> To fix this:
> 1. I can ren
On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 01:44:23 PM Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
> wrote:
> > Adding PowerPC list
> >
> > On 13/08/13 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:27:47 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> >>> The following cha
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
wrote:
> Adding PowerPC list
>
> On 13/08/13 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:27:47 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> d4e4ab86bcba5a72779c43dc1459f71fea3d89c8:
>>>
>>> L
On 08/13/2013 05:40 PM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> Adding PowerPC list
>
> On 13/08/13 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:27:47 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> d4e4ab86bcba5a72779c43dc1459f71fea3d89c8:
>>>
>>> Linux 3.11-
On 13/08/13 16:40, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> Adding PowerPC list
>
> On 13/08/13 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:27:47 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> d4e4ab86bcba5a72779c43dc1459f71fea3d89c8:
>>>
>>> Linux 3.11-rc5 (
Adding PowerPC list
On 13/08/13 14:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, August 12, 2013 02:27:47 PM Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> The following changes since commit
>> d4e4ab86bcba5a72779c43dc1459f71fea3d89c8:
>>
>> Linux 3.11-rc5 (2013-08-11 18:04:20 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the git
17 matches
Mail list logo
