Re: [DTC] small ftdump cleanup patch

On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 09:40:57AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > Here is a small patch to clean up the usage info and the error returns > for ftdump -- not sure what the future holds for ftdump vs. simply using > "dtc -I dtb -O dts someblob.dtb" ... I expect ftdump to stay around for the forseeab

Re: [DTC] small ftdump cleanup patch

Jon Loeliger wrote: So, like, the other day Paul Gortmaker mumbled: Here is a small patch to clean up the usage info and the error returns for ftdump -- not sure what the future holds for ftdump vs. simply using "dtc -I dtb -O dts someblob.dtb" ... Paul. Paul, Any chance of a signed-

Re: [DTC] small ftdump cleanup patch

So, like, the other day Paul Gortmaker mumbled: > Here is a small patch to clean up the usage info and the error returns > for ftdump -- not sure what the future holds for ftdump vs. simply using > "dtc -I dtb -O dts someblob.dtb" ... > > Paul. Paul, Any chance of a signed-off-by line? Thanks,

[DTC] small ftdump cleanup patch

Here is a small patch to clean up the usage info and the error returns for ftdump -- not sure what the future holds for ftdump vs. simply using "dtc -I dtb -O dts someblob.dtb" ... Paul. diff --git a/ftdump.c b/ftdump.c index 53343d7..49bc7cf 100644 --- a/ftdump.c +++ b/ftdump.c @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@