Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > This softlockup is seen in the 2.6.24-rc4 either and looks like a > message because this is seen while running tbench and machine > continues running other test's after the softlockup messages and some > times seen with the bootup,

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-04 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not? >> Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4. > > just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device > init), not just a message

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not? > > Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4. just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device init), not just a message, right? Ingo ___

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-03 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:58:06 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 200

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ten million is close enough to infinity for

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume that we bro

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume that we broke the > > driver and that's never going to terminate. > > > > how about this? does

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume that we broke the > driver and that's never going to terminate. > how about this? doesn't break things on my pa8800: diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c b/drive

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:08 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Ba

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:08 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-28 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> (cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx) >>> Soft lockup is detected w

[BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-28 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Hi, Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.6.24-rc3-git2 on powerbox BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [insmod:375] NIP: c002f02c LR: d01414fc CTR: c002f018 REGS: c0077cbef0b0 TRAP: 0901 Not tainted (2.6.24-rc3-git2-autotest) MSR: 80009032 CR: 2

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, (cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx) > Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.6.24-rc3-git2 on powerbox I assume this is a post-2.6.23 regression? > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 11s! [insmod:375] > NIP: c

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > > > > (cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx) > > > >> Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-28 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > > (cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx) > >> Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.6.24-rc3-git2 on powerbox > > I assume this is a post-2.6.23 regression? > >> BUG: soft lockup - CP