Hoy hoy !
It's late, I know, but finally here's a first batch of patches in
powerpc "next" branch that I pushed out today. Hopefully more to come
as I start pulling from Kumar, Grant, etc...
Cheers,
Ben.
Alexey Dobriyan (1):
Convert /proc/device-tree/ to seq_file
Anton Vorontsov (2):
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
So I opened powerpc-next, and pushed the pile that was in "test" (with
an additional bug fix to one of my patches that was causing the crash
at boot that mpe reported with hugetlbfs enabled).
The pre-req patch for adding an argument to __pte_free_tlb() has already
b
So I opened powerpc-next, and pushed the pile that was in "test" (with
an additional bug fix to one of my patches that was causing the crash
at boot that mpe reported with hugetlbfs enabled).
The pre-req patch for adding an argument to __pte_free_tlb() has already
been merged upstream by Linus.
N
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 08:54 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Benjamin
> Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > I pushed the following commits, along with merging Linus tree in today.
>
> Is there a reason you keep ignoring my patch?
Other than I hate you ? just kidding :-)
> [PATCH
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Benjamin
Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I pushed the following commits, along with merging Linus tree in today.
Is there a reason you keep ignoring my patch?
[PATCH 1/2 v9] powerpc: introduce macro spin_event_timeout()
There is PowerPC code in the ALSA tree that depends
I pushed the following commits, along with merging Linus tree in today.
Note that it will not boot on various machines unless the allocator
init ordering problem I mentioned earlier is fixed.
Benjamin Herrenschmidt (1):
powerpc: Fix bug in move of altivec code to vector.S
Josh Boyer (3):
Quoting Benjamin Herrenschmidt :
Hi !
I've updated my "next" branch with the following patches. We're getting
real close to the merge window now, so if something is missing, please
holler ASAP.
Could you please pull the 'next' branch of the 4xx tree? I haven't
had a chance to generate a fo
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 21:09 -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> I was expecting an rc9 and another week. Probably others where caught
> off guard. Patch below.
>
Note that this simple patch qualifies as a bug fix in my book and thus
is less constrainted. I would happily have merged it in -rc4 :-)
Chee
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:50:52 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> n Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:56 -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> > What ever happened to this patch?
>
> Dunno... It should have been in patchwork. I remember the patch
> in fact and I intended to merge it... Can you re-submit with
>
On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 17:56 -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote:
> What ever happened to this patch?
Dunno... It should have been in patchwork. I remember the patch
in fact and I intended to merge it... Can you re-submit with appropriate
cset comment, signed-off-by etc... ?
(Mistakes -do- happen, which i
What ever happened to this patch?
diff --git b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp.c
a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp.c index c511880..7f3c1c7 100644
--- b/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp.c
+++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp.c
@@ -43,7 +43,13 @@ static int __init warp_probe(void)
{
unsign
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Benjamin
Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I've updated my "next" branch with the following patches. We're getting
> real close to the merge window now, so if something is missing, please
> holler ASAP.
[PATCH 1/2 v9] powerpc: introduce macro spin_event_timeout()
--
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> I've updated my "next" branch with the following patches. We're getting
> real close to the merge window now, so if something is missing, please
> holler ASAP.
Just these two; but I see you've got them marked "under review
Hi !
I've updated my "next" branch with the following patches. We're getting
real close to the merge window now, so if something is missing, please
holler ASAP.
Cheers,
Ben.
Becky Bruce (1):
powerpc: Add support for swiotlb on 32-bit
Benjamin Herrenschmidt (8):
powerpc/mm: Fix some
How about the iomap_early() patch? What would you like me to do with that
one?
g.
On Jun 1, 2009 9:04 PM, "Benjamin Herrenschmidt"
wrote:
I've updated powerpc "next branch" with the following patches:
(Kumar: The swiotlb patch is still segregated in "test" until we resolve
how it's going to b
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:26 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> How about the iomap_early() patch? What would you like me to do with
> that one?
Wait for me to review it :-)
Cheers,
Ben.
> g.
>
> > On Jun 1, 2009 9:04 PM, "Benjamin Herrenschmidt"
> > wrote:
> >
> > I've updated powerpc "next branch
I've updated powerpc "next branch" with the following patches:
(Kumar: The swiotlb patch is still segregated in "test" until we resolve
how it's going to be merged vs. Ian Campbell series).
Anton Blanchard (1):
powerpc: Convert RTAS event scan from kernel thread to workqueue
Michael Ellerm
Hi Ben,
On Thu, 21 May 2009 17:26:00 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> I updated my "next" branch with the following patches. If something
> older than a week old is missing (and not already delegated to a
> maintainer on patchwork) please let me know.
Not older than a week, but trivial a
I updated my "next" branch with the following patches. If something
older than a week old is missing (and not already delegated to a
maintainer on patchwork) please let me know.
Anton Blanchard (1):
powerpc: Improve decrementer accuracy
Anton Vorontsov (6):
powerpc/85xx: Add PCI IDs f
Hi !
The powerpc.git next branch has now been updated with the following
patches. The "test" branch has been reset.
commit 6071ed0487c6ea8dcfadd9844b9b90944cd9de1e
Author: Michael Ellerman
Date: Thu Jan 22 20:54:33 2009 +
powerpc/pseries: Return the number of MSIs we could allocate
On Dec 3, 2008, at 5:34 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Kumar Gala writes:
Can you update to -rc7 or greater. Also can we look at picking up
outstanding patches.
Done. I notice there are quite a few on patchwork that are delegated
to you. Are you going to send me a pull request shortly?
Yeah
Kumar Gala writes:
> Can you update to -rc7 or greater. Also can we look at picking up
> outstanding patches.
Done. I notice there are quite a few on patchwork that are delegated
to you. Are you going to send me a pull request shortly?
Paul.
___
L
Paul,
Can you update to -rc7 or greater. Also can we look at picking up
outstanding patches.
- k
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
23 matches
Mail list logo
