On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
>
> |
> | - to add an ABI to support those vendor files
> |
> | And those are IMHO five good technical reasons to disagree with your
> | approach.
> |
> | My suggestion to resolve the technical objections and lift the
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 01:09:54PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > |
> > > | - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 05:31:26PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > |
> > | - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
> > |high level structure, that IMHO didn't work very well when OProfil
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:50:42PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
SNIP
> |
> | - to blindly follow some poorly constructed vendor format with no
> |high level structure, that IMHO didn't work very well when OProfile
> |was written, and misrepresenting it as 'symbolic event names'.
Ingo Molnar [mi...@kernel.org] wrote:
Meant to Cc Tom Huynh as they had a related patchset a few months
ago.
|
| * Michael Ellerman wrote:
|
| > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
| > > * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
| > >
| > > > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kl
|
| * Michael Ellerman wrote:
|
| > > We just merged a patch series that was first sent in 2013. Some
| > > things take time to get right.
| >
| > The first attempt to get symbolic event name support into perf was
| > sent in 2010, that's FIVE years ago [1].
|
| kgdb took even longer, I thin
> My suggestion to resolve the technical objections and lift the NAK
> would be:
>
> - to add the tables to the source code, in a more human readable
>format and (optionally) structure the event names better into a
>higher level hierarchy, than the humungous linear dumps with no
>
* Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > We just merged a patch series that was first sent in 2013. Some
> > things take time to get right.
>
> The first attempt to get symbolic event name support into perf was
> sent in 2010, that's FIVE years ago [1].
kgdb took even longer, I think it was first propo
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > > > can specify perf events by t
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:55:41AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
> >
> > This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's patchset from
* Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> >
> > > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > > can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
> > >
> > > This is a reba
On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 10:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
>
> > This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> > can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
> >
> > This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's patchset from Jul 30, 20
* Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> This is another attempt to resurrect Andi Kleen's patchset so users
> can specify perf events by their event names rather than raw codes.
>
> This is a rebase of Andi Kleen's patchset from Jul 30, 2014[1] to 4.0.
> (I fixed minor and not so minor conflicts).
So t
13 matches
Mail list logo
