red in dm for targets that map to underlying devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson # For MMC
FYI, for now I don't expect any other patches in my mmc tree to clash
with this for v6.11, assuming that is the target.
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> .
On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 at 17:21, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 01:53:25PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > At this point we have suggested to drivers to switch to use threaded
> > irq handlers (and regular work queues if needed too). That said,
> &g
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 17:03, Allen Pais wrote:
>
> The only generic interface to execute asynchronously in the BH context is
> tasklet; however, it's marked deprecated and has some design flaws. To
> replace tasklets, BH workqueue support was recently added. A BH workqueue
> behaves similarly to
e u8 in their control messages.
>
> In moxa_tiocmget(), dtr variable was reused for line status which
> requires int so use a separate variable for status.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson # For MMC
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
&g
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 15:24, Ilpo Järvinen
wrote:
>
> Convert various parameter names for ->dtr_rts() and related functions
> from onoff, on, and raise to active.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson # For MMC
Kind regards
U
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 at 16:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>
> Sorry; things keep getting in the way of finishing this :/
>
> As such, I need a bit of time to get on-track again..
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:03:57PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> > > --- a/drivers/
t; Cc: Heiko Carstens
> Cc: Helge Deller
> Cc: Herbert Xu
> Cc: Huacai Chen
> Cc: Hugh Dickins
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski
> Cc: James E.J. Bottomley
> Cc: Jan Kara
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe
> Cc: Jens Axboe
> Cc: Johannes Berg
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet
> Cc: Jozsef K
-
> kernel/trace/trace.c | 3 ++
> lib/ubsan.c | 5 ++-
> mm/kasan/kasan.h | 4 ++
> mm/kasan/shadow.c | 38 ++
> tools/objtool/check.c | 17
> 121 files changed, 511 insertions(+), 420 deletions(-)
Thanks for cleaning up the situation!
I have applied this on a plain v6.0 (only one patch had a minor
conflict) and tested this on an ARM64 Dragonboard 410c, which uses
cpuidle-psci and the cpuidle-psci-domain. I didn't observe any
problems, so feel free to add:
Tested-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 13:03, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 12:18, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > Doing RCU-idle outside the driver, only to then temporarily enable it
> > again before going idle is daft.
> >
> > Notably: this co
s good to me.
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 10 +-
> drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 24
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain
On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 12:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> OMAP was the one and only user.
OMAP? :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c |8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 d
e
> deeper into the idle path").
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
FWIW:
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c |6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
> +++
On Mon, 19 Sept 2022 at 12:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> All callers should still have RCU enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> kernel/cpu_pm.c |9 -
> 1 f
trably intertwined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c|4 ++--
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c|2 ++
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-arm.c|1 +
> driv
álvez (For ipack)
> Reviewed-by: Tom Rix (For fpga)
> Acked-by: Geoff Levand (For ps3)
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson # For MMC
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 08:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Use the blk_mq_alloc_disk API to simplify the gendisk and request_queue
> allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/memstick/co
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 08:54, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> Use the blk_mq_alloc_disk API to simplify the gendisk and request_queue
> allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Acked-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/memstick
On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 06:49, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 12:41:37AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 May 2021 at 07:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > this series is the first part of c
| 23 +
> 30 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 466 deletions(-)
This looks like a nice cleanup to me. Feel free to add, for the series:
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> Tested-by: Christian Zigotzky
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman
Thanks Michael for helping out fixing and this! The patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/of/Kconfig | 4
> drivers/of/ad
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 10:17, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> Am 16.01.20 um 16:46 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky
> > wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card in
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
> [1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree?
No, because according to previous discussion that isn't the correct
solution and more importantly it wil
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 09:24, Yinbo Zhu wrote:
>
> This patch is to add erratum A011334 support in ls1028a 1.0 SoC
>
> Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu
Applied for next, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drive
On 30 June 2017 at 13:53, Ivan Mikhaylov wrote:
> shdci-st driver can be used for ppc476 fsp2 soc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Mikhaylov
Thanks, applied for next!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/driv
On 10 November 2016 at 10:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 6:19:06 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 5:56 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> > On Wednesday, November 9, 2016 2:3
me Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{powerpc => soc}/fsl/guts.txt (91%)
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c
>
> --
> 2.1.0.27.g96db324
>
Thanks, applied on my mmc tree for next!
I noticed that some DT compatibles weren't documented, according to
checkpatch. Please fix that asap!
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
On 21 September 2016 at 08:57, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> This patchset is used to fix a host version register bug in the
> T4240-R1.0-R2.0
> eSDHC controller. To match the SoC version and revision, 10 previous version
> patchsets had tried many methods but all of them were rejected by reviewers.
> Such
On 6 September 2016 at 10:28, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> We keep running into cases where device drivers want to know the exact
> version of the a SoC they are currently running on. In the past, this has
> usually been done through a vendor specific API that can be called by a
> driver, or by directly acc
On 26 May 2016 at 06:05, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> Hi Uffe,
>
> Could we merge this patchset? ...
> It has been a long time to wait for Arnd's response...
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
As we are still in the merge window I won't queue anything but fixes.
Let's give Arnd another week or so to respond.
Kind rega
On 4 May 2016 at 05:24, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> Add maintainer entry for Freescale SoC driver including
> the QE library and the GUTS driver now. Also add maintainer
> for QE library.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
So I need an ack from Scott and Qiang for this one, then I intend to
queue up the series
>>
>> I was about to queue this for next, when I noticed that checkpatch is
>> complaining/warning lots about these patches. Can you please a round of
>> checkpatch and fix what makes sense.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe
>
> [Lu Yangbo-B47093] Sorry about this, Uffe...
No worries!
> Should I ignore
On 1 April 2016 at 05:07, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> This patchset is used to fix a host version register bug in the
> T4240-R1.0-R2.0
> eSDHC controller. To get the SoC version and revision, it's needed to add the
> GUTS driver to access the global utilities registers.
>
> So, the first three patches ar
- decreasing the cc list significantly
On 1 April 2016 at 05:07, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> Move mpc85xx.h to include/linux/fsl and rename it to svr.h as
> a common header file. It has been used for mpc85xx and it will
> be used for ARM-based SoC as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yangbo Lu
> Acked-by: Wolfram
On 27 July 2015 at 17:57, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 09:58 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 25 July 2015 at 04:27, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 15:02 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> > > On 21 July 2015 at 11:45, Yangbo Lu wrote:
>
On 25 July 2015 at 04:27, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 15:02 +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 21 July 2015 at 11:45, Yangbo Lu wrote:
>> > For T4240-R1.0-R2.0, the HOSTVER register has incorrcet vender
>> > version value and sdhc spec version value. This wi
On 19 June 2015 at 14:28, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Suman Tripathi wrote:
>> This patch disables the 1.8V signaling for arasan 4.9a version
>> of SDHCI controller with the help SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V quirk.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Tripathi
>> ---
>> ---
On 21 July 2015 at 11:45, Yangbo Lu wrote:
> For T4240-R1.0-R2.0, the HOSTVER register has incorrcet vender
> version value and sdhc spec version value. This will break down
> the ADMA data transfer. So add workaround to get right value
> VVN=0x13, SVN = 0x1.
So T4240-R1.0-R2.0 is the version of
On 8 June 2015 at 10:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
>>> >
>>> >Can you test this patch on imx SoC ?
>>> >
>>>
>>> (Your email have some format issue.)
>>
>> Yeah missed to sent in plain text mode.
>>
>>
[...]
>> >
>> >Can you test this patch on imx SoC ?
>> >
>>
>> (Your email have some format issue.)
>
> Yeah missed to sent in plain text mode.
>
>>
>> I have tested this patch and it does not break imx SoC.
>> You can add my tag.
>> Tested-by: Dong Aisheng
>
> Thanks Dong !!
>
>>
>> However
On 21 May 2015 at 10:43, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> The sdhci framework disables SDR104/SDR50/DDR50 based on only quirk.
> This patch adds the support to disable SDR104/SDR50/DDR50 based on
> reading the capability register 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Tripathi
> ---
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
On 12 May 2015 at 09:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 May 2015 11:03:46 Suman Tripathi wrote:
>> > @@ -533,6 +567,15 @@
>> > interrupts = <0x0 0x4f 0x4>;
>> > };
>> >
>> > + sdhci0: sdhci@1c00 {
>> > + compatib
On 5 May 2015 at 12:34, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 5 May 2015 at 11:17, Suman Tripathi wrote:
>> This patch adds the arasan sdhc nodes to reuse the of-arasan
>> driver for APM X-Gene SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Tripathi
>
> I consider this one acked by Arnd,
On 5 May 2015 at 10:42, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 4 May 2015 at 15:39, Suman Tripathi wrote:
>>> This patch adds the SDHCI support for APM X-Gene SoC using ARASAN SDHCI
>>> controller.
>&g
On 4 May 2015 at 15:39, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> This patch adds the SDHCI support for APM X-Gene SoC using ARASAN SDHCI
> controller.
>
> v1 change:
> * Use the CONFIG_ARM64_DMA_HAS_IOMMU for dma-mapping.
>
> v2 change:
> * Drop the IOMMU support and switching to PIO mode for arasan.
>contr
On 30 March 2015 at 16:46, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> This patch adds some quirks support to be read from fdt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suman Tripathi
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c | 15 +++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c b/drivers/
On 4 February 2015 at 07:33, Kevin Hao wrote:
> Since commit cd1e65044d44 ("of/device: Don't register disabled
> devices"), the disabled device will not be registered at all. So
> we don't need to do the check again in the platform device driver.
>
> And the check in the current code is useless ev
On 26 February 2015 at 13:08, Kevin Hao wrote:
> The PPC_OF is a ppc specific option which is used to mean that the
> firmware device tree access functions are available. Since all the
> ppc platforms have a device tree, it is aways set to 'y' for ppc.
> So it makes no sense to keep a such option
On 28 January 2015 at 20:52, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> The reset code was pushed into the esdhc-imx driver, but missed being
> pushed into the FSL OF driver at the same time. The commit that broke
> the OF ESDHC driver was 0718e59ae259f7c48155b4e852d8b0632d59028e
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Hicks
M
On 1 September 2014 17:32, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> In preparation to change the public API to return a per-user clk structure,
> remove any usage of this public API from the clock implementations.
>
> The reason for having this in a separate commit from the one that introduces
> the implementation o
On 12 August 2014 12:37, Pawel Moll wrote:
> The code selecting a device for the sdhci host has been
> continuously tweaked (4b711cb13843f5082e82970dd1e8031383134a65
> "mmc: sdhci-pltfm: Add structure for host-specific data" and
> a4d2177f00a5252d825236c5124bc1e9918bdb41 "mmc: sdhci-pltfm: dt
> de
On 11 August 2014 11:32, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 11 August 2014 11:15, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 10:07 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 8 August 2014 18:36, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>> > On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 15:23 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
>>>
On 11 August 2014 11:15, Pawel Moll wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 10:07 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 8 August 2014 18:36, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 15:23 +0100, Pawel Moll wrote:
>> >> The code selecting a device for the sdhci host has b
; The comment saying "Some PCI-based MFD need the parent here"
>> seem to refer to Timberdale FPGA driver (the only MFD driver
>> registering SDHCI cell, drivers/mfd/timberdale.c) but again,
>> the only situation when parent device matter is runtime PM,
>> whi
On 27 juni 2014 04:23:42 CEST, Vincent Yang
wrote:
>2014-06-26 17:42 GMT+08:00 Ulf Hansson :
>>
>>
>> On 26 juni 2014 08:23:32 CEST, Vincent Yang
> wrote:
>>>This patch adds manual resume for some embedded platforms with rootfs
&g
On 26 juni 2014 08:23:32 CEST, Vincent Yang
wrote:
>This patch adds manual resume for some embedded platforms with rootfs
>stored in SD card. It references CONFIG_MMC_BLOCK_DEFERRED_RESUME in
>kernel 3.10. It lets host controller driver to manually handle resume
>by itself.
>
>[symptom]
>This i
On 16 June 2014 14:17, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 June 2014 12:46, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:08:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>>> @@ -1507,25 +1529,7 @@ static void sdhci_do_set_ios(struct sdhci_host
>>&
a || d < c)) || z == f)
>
> With the former "style", I normally end up having to pull the file into
> the editor, and rewrite the damned statement to work out what the
> grouping is, because the excessive use of parenthesis is detrimental to
> readability. Don't do it. Learn the C precedence rules and keep code
> readable.
Sure, we will adopt.
Please, feel free to send a patch to fixup my misstake. I will happily apply it.
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On 25 April 2014 13:20, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 01:18:28PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 25 April 2014 11:03, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 01:13:05PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >> On 24
On 25 April 2014 11:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 01:13:05PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 24 April 2014 12:57, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > This is nothing new or unexpected - it was last posted back in February,
>> >
On 24 April 2014 12:57, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:52:11PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 24 April 2014 12:17, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> >> I hav
On 24 April 2014 12:17, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:25:42AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> I have looked though the patches up until patch 33 and this is clearly
>> a nice piece of clean-up /fixes work for sdhci. Besides my minor
>> comments pe
d them on Chris' mmc-next branch,
unfortunate it fails at patch 23, so it would be nice to get a
re-based patchset for the mmc-next branch.
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt | 11 +
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl-cubox-i.dtsi| 34 +-
&g
62 matches
Mail list logo
