On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:10:49AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> A powerpc ppc64_defconfig build of Linus' current tree produces these
> warnings:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for submitting the patch! As it turns out, a patch that was
pretty much identical to yours was submitted by Alexander Beregalov
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:26:57AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> However, have you made any progress on Christoph's suggestion:
>
> "The real fix is that ext4 shouldn't be using ZERO_PAGE(). Please use
> the same zeroing helpers all the other filesystems and drivers use."
When Aneesh asked for
So I screwed this one up. Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa
I assume Stephen's already sent this to patch to you guys (I picked it
up from the linux-next git tree), but just in case he didn't
- Ted
>From 7919d4874fe991abd0b686ac1f681
Once again, this time with feeling
- Ted
>From c91cfaabc17f8a53807a2f31f067a732e34a1550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:50:39 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] powerpc: Export empty_zero_pa
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:41:10PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> I suspect you meant arch/*powerpc* arch ppc, wont fix the problem ;P
>
Um, right. I didn't know about this:
> Why: The arch/powerpc tree is the merged architecture for ppc32 and ppc64
> platforms. Currently there are effor
