stance you need to help you
pin-point the problem...
Thanks for your help
Stef
Stef Simoens schreef:
Hello Ben,
Thank you for your reply.
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 00:18 +0200, Stef Simoens wrote:
I tried the latest 2.6.31-rc3-git3 (without any other patch).
However, I have the same b
Hey Benjamin,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt schreef:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 01:42 +0200, Stef Simoens wrote:
What would be the best approach?
- if the kernel boots, it's obviously 'good'
- but what if the kernel hits the 'BUG', should I apply your patch
then? If it doe
Benjamin Herrenschmidt schreef:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 20:22 +0200, Stef Simoens wrote:
2.6.29 works OK
2.6.30-rc1 doesn't work (BUG...)
2.6.30-rc1 with your patch ... seems to hang when it should be
mounting the root directory.
Is it worthwhile doing a git bisect?
It probab
Hello,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt schreef:
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 00:18 +0200, Stef Simoens wrote:
I tried the latest 2.6.31-rc3-git3 (without any other patch).
However, I have the same behaviour as the patched 2.6.30 (so: no BUG,
but the mesh_abort messages).
Would it be possible for you
Hello Ben,
Thank you for your reply.
> On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 00:18 +0200, Stef Simoens wrote:
>> I tried the latest 2.6.31-rc3-git3 (without any other patch).
>> However, I have the same behaviour as the patched 2.6.30 (so: no BUG,
>> but the mesh_abort messages).
> Woul
as the patched 2.6.30 (so: no BUG,
but the mesh_abort messages).
Anybody knows what's going wrong, and how to fix it? I've read the
history of this list of June and July ... but I didn't find any other
reports of the problem I'm encountering...
Th
