On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> BTW ppc64_defconfig didn't quite like 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 either ...
> IIRC I got build failures in:
> drivers/net/spider_net.c
Fixing the above showed up another problem in another file of the
same driver (drivers/net/spider_net_et
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> BTW ppc64_defconfig didn't quite like 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 either ...
> IIRC I got build failures in:
> drivers/net/spider_net.c
[PATCH -mm] spider_net: Misc build fixes after recent netdev stats changes
Unbreak the follow
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> BTW ppc64_defconfig didn't quite like 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 either ...
> IIRC I got build failures in:
> drivers/md/raid6int8.c
This turned out to be a gcc bug -- I was using an old cross-compiler.
___
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> BTW ppc64_defconfig didn't quite like 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 either ...
> IIRC I got build failures in:
> drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/21/557
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
a_bmdma_drive_eh' from
incompatible pointer type
drivers/ata/pata_scc.c:908: warning: passing arg 5 of 'ata_bmdma_drive_eh' from
incompatible pointer type
make[2]: *** [drivers/ata/pata_scc.o] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> allmodconfig on ppc64 fails to build with the following error
BTW ppc64_defconfig didn't quite like 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 either ...
IIRC I got build failures in:
drivers/ata/pata_scc.c
drivers/md/raid6int8.c
drivers/net/spider_net.c
drivers/net/pasemi_mac.c
> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:37:49 -0700
> Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:13:40 +0530 (IST) Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > Untested (not even compile-tested) patch.
> > > Could someone point me to ppc32/64 cross-co
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> > [ cut here ]
> > Badness at arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:202
>
> comes when smp_call_function_map() has been called with irqs disabled,
> which is illegal. However, there is a special case, the panic(
he definition
of __smp_call_function().
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Untested (not even compile-tested) patch.
Could someone point me to ppc32/64 cross-compilers for i386?
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 27 ++-
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 dele
Hi Kamalesh,
There's two things at work here ...
On 9/14/07, Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With 2.6.23-rc6 running on the ppc64 box, following oops is hit
>
> Oops: Machine check, sig: 7 [#1]
>
> SMP NR_CPUS=128 pSeries
>
> Modules linked in: binfmt_misc ipv6 dm_mod ehci_
> Subject : ext4 build warnings
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/18/420
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status : unknown
Mingming Cao fixed this:
Hi,
I'm totally confuzed by this patch ...
On 7/14/07, Linas Vepstas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a patch (& bug report) for a crash in sysctl_set_parent()
> in 2.6.22-git2.
Are you sure you saw this crash on 22-git2 (Linus' tree) ???
> Problem: 2.6.22-git2 crashes with a stack trace
12 matches
Mail list logo