Just out of curiosity: What's the difference (if any) between -mcpu=e500mc64
and -mcpu=e5500? AFAIK -mcpu=e500mc64 is supported by gcc since at least
version 4.6 whereas -mcpu=e5500 is only supported since gcc 4.8. But is there
actually any difference?
Rojhalat
On Tuesday 20 August 2013 21
.
fsl_indirect_read_config is now only used for booke/86xx PCIe controllers.
Reported-by: Michael Guntsche
Cc: Scott Wood
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
---
v3: Fix compile error
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 24 +---
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch
On Friday 14 June 2013 22:17:34 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-06-15 at 12:02 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-06-14 at 17:06 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > I was pretty much able to reproduce this on my PA Semi PPC box. Funny
> > > thing is, when I type on the consol
On Friday 14 June 2013 15:18:03 Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/14/2013 04:05:34 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > Commit 50d8f87d2b3 (powerpc/fsl-pci Make PCIe hotplug work with
> > Freescale
> > PCIe controllers) does not handle non-PCIe controllers properly,
> > which causes
.
fsl_indirect_read_config is now only used for booke/86xx PCIe controllers.
Reported-by: Michael Guntsche
Cc: Scott Wood
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
---
v2: Make it more consistent.
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 20 +++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch
On Thursday 13 June 2013 11:49:17 Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 02:21:24 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:50:26 Scott Wood wrote:
> > > On 06/12/2013 03:19:30 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 June 2013 12:28:59 Scot
devices a check is added to differentiate between PCI and PCIe
controllers.
Reported-by: Michael Guntsche
Cc: Scott Wood
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:50:26 Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 03:19:30 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 June 2013 12:28:59 Scott Wood wrote:
> > > Yes, I figured it was non-PCIe because the code change that you said
> > > helped was on the non
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 12:28:59 Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/11/2013 12:09:42 PM, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Scott Wood
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On 06/11/2013 02:24:28 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > >> On Monday 10 June 2013
On Monday 10 June 2013 17:52:33 Scott Wood wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 12:07:43 PM, Michael Guntsche wrote:
> > Good evening,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > could you ple
Hi Mike,
could you please try this patch:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2013-May/106624.html
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244515/
Rojhalat
On Saturday 08 June 2013 21:39:37 Michael Guntsche wrote:
> After bisecting I found the responsible commit.
>
> 50d8f87d2b3: powe
nk. The device won't be really rescaned. Reset the bus->number to
> hose->first_busno in the function fsl_pcie_check_link(), it will do the
> real checking PCI-e link status for the second controller, the device will
> be rescaned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuanquan Chen
Tested-by: Rojhala
;
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala
Acked-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |5 ++-
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 69
> ++--- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 40
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ar
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |6
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 51 +-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/indirect_pci.c| 10 ++
3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/in
Hi Kumar,
what about this patch? Any reasons not to apply?
Rojhalat
On Monday 18 March 2013 10:22:40 Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> On Thursday 14 March 2013 15:35:40 Kumar Gala wrote:
> > On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:43 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 13 March 2013 1
On Thursday 14 March 2013 15:35:40 Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2013, at 4:43 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 March 2013 14:07:16 Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> >> b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c
> >> inde
entually calls
fsl_indirect_read_config, so the kernel hangs in a recursion loop. Below is a
modified patch that does work.
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h |6
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 51 ++---
work for PCIe IP rev 3.0 as I'm not sure how to handle "struct
resource" aside from making it global or changing "struct pci_controller".
Rojhalat
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 51 ++---
a
On Tuesday 12 March 2013 19:03:39 Chen Yuanquan-B41889 wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 06:30 PM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 March 2013 18:12:20 Chen Yuanquan-B41889 wrote:
> >>>> -Original Message-
> >>>> From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev
On Tuesday 12 March 2013 18:12:20 Chen Yuanquan-B41889 wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-
> >> fei.zang=freescale@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Rojhalat Ibrahim
> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013
config into fsl_pci.c
>
> - k
>
Ok, how about this:
Signed-off-by: Rojhalat Ibrahim
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 49
++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/
Hi,
this issue was brought up before.
See this thread:
https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2012-July/099529.html
The following patch works for me.
Hot-added devices appear after "echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/rescan".
I tested it with a P5020DS development system.
Signed-off
22 matches
Mail list logo
