Re: [PATCH][sata_fsl] Defer non-ncq commands when ncq commands active

2009-07-29 Thread Robert Hancock
On 07/29/2009 10:03 AM, ashish kalra wrote: From: Ashish Kalra Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:15:49 +0530 Fix for non-ncq & ncq commands causing timeouts when both are issued simultaneously to the same device. Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra --- drivers/ata/sata_fsl.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertio

Re: [PATCH 2.6.22.y] ieee1394: revert "sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping"

2007-08-06 Thread Robert Hancock
sit this whenever an actual need arises. Not sure this is a very good idea. This seems rather likely to fail on x86_64 machines with >4GB of RAM for example.. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Page: http://www.robert

Re: [PATCH 2.6.22.y] ieee1394: revert "sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping"

2007-08-06 Thread Robert Hancock
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 16:25 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote: >>> Anyway. For now I will simply go with what 2.6.23-rc has and what >>> 2.6.21 had: No dma_set_mask anywhere in the 1394 subsystem. We can >>> revisit this whenever an actual