Re: [PATCH 04/13] perf/core: Extend perf_output_sample_regs() to include perf_arch_regs

On 28 August 2016 at 16:00, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c > index 274288819829..e16bf4d057d1 100644 > --- a/kernel/events/core.c > +++ b/kernel/events/core.c > @@ -5371,16 +5371,24 @@ u64 __attribute__((weak)) perf_arch_reg_value(struct > pe

Re: [PATCH 00/13] Add support for perf_arch_regs

On 28 August 2016 at 16:00, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: > Patchset to extend PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR to include > platform specific PMU registers. > > Patchset applies cleanly on tip:perf/core branch > > It's a perennial request from hardware folks to be able to > see the raw values of the pmu regist

Re: [PATCH 6/6] ppc: ebpf/jit: Implement JIT compiler for extended BPF

Naveen, can you point out where in the patch you update the variable: idx, a member of codegen_contex structure? Somehow I am unable to figure it out. I can only see that we set it to 0 in the bpf_int_jit_compile function. Since all your test cases pass, I am clearly overlooking something. Than