Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] libnvdimm/nvdimm/flush: Allow architecture to override the flush barrier

2020-05-22 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Fri, 22 May 2020, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > On 5/22/20 3:01 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote: > > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 02:52:30PM -0400, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 May 2020, Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > &g

Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] libnvdimm/nvdimm/flush: Allow architecture to override the flush barrier

2020-05-21 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Thu, 21 May 2020, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 10:03 AM Aneesh Kumar K.V > wrote: > > > > > Moving on to the patch itself--Aneesh, have you audited other persistent > > > memory users in the kernel? For example, drivers/md/dm-writecache.c does > > > this: > > > > > > stati

Re: [3.13.y.z extended stable] Patch "locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some architectures" has been added to staging queue

2014-08-06 Thread Mikulas Patocka
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Andev wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Kamal Mostafa wrote: > > This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled > > > > locking/mutex: Disable optimistic spinning on some architectures > > > > to the linux-3.13.y-queue branch of the 3.13.y.z