Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/tests/base_probe: Fix check for the count of existing probes in test_adding_kernel

On Sun, 3 Nov 2024, Athira Rajeev wrote: > > On 17 Oct 2024, at 3:44 PM, Michael Petlan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024, Athira Rajeev wrote: [...] > > > > I am wondering how it could happen that there were other > > probes in the system? > > Hi

Re: [PATCH V2] tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe: Enhance print_overall_results to print summary information

On Mon, 4 Nov 2024, Athira Rajeev wrote: > Currently print_overall_results prints the number of > fails in the summary, example from base_probe tests in > testsuite_probe: > > ## [ FAIL ] ## perf_probe :: test_invalid_options SUMMARY :: > 11 failures found > > test_invalid_options contains

Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/tests/base_probe: Fix check for the count of existing probes in test_adding_kernel

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024, Athira Rajeev wrote: > perftool-testsuite_probe fails in test_adding_kernel as below: > Regexp not found: "probe:inode_permission_11" > -- [ FAIL ] -- perf_probe :: test_adding_kernel :: force-adding probes > :: > second probe adding (with force) (output rege

Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/tests/shell/base_probe: Enhance print_overall_results to print summary information

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024, Athira Rajeev wrote: > Currently print_overall_results prints the number of > fails in the summary, example from base_probe tests in > testsuite_probe: > > ## [ FAIL ] ## perf_probe :: test_invalid_options SUMMARY :: > 11 failures found > > test_invalid_options contain