Hello Gabriel,
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabriel Paubert [mailto:paub...@iram.es]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:19 PM
> To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> Cc: Lennert Buytenhek; t...@cyrius.com; LinuxPPC; pac...@kosh.dhis.org;
net...@vger.kernel.org; David
> Miller
>
Hello Gabriel,
> -Original Message-
> From: Gabriel Paubert [mailto:paub...@iram.es]
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 1:48 PM
> To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> Cc: Lennert Buytenhek; t...@cyrius.com; LinuxPPC; pac...@kosh.dhis.org;
net...@vger.kernel.org; David
> Miller
>
> -Original Message-
> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+emilian.medve=freescale@ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-
> bounces+emilian.medve=freescale@ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Gabriel
Paubert
> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 12:38 PM
> To: Lennert Buytenhek
> Cc: t...@cyrius.com; LinuxPPC; pac...
Hello Paul,
> You're right, thanks for checking. In that case:
>
> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wonder what did you decide about this patch?
Cheer,
Emil.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/m
Hello Michael,
> > That won't work if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not defined, because in
> > that case
> > debugfs_create_file() returns -ENODEV.
>
> Will respin.
At a second glance in arch/powerpc/Kconfig.debug, VIRQ_DEBUG depends on
DEBUG_FS so I think that the patch should work as is.
Cheers,
Emi
Hello Michael,
> That won't work if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not defined, because in
> that case
> debugfs_create_file() returns -ENODEV.
Will respin.
Thanks,
Emil.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Grant Likely
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 6:28 PM
> To: Medve Emilian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC]
> -Original Message-
> From: Medve Emilian
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Medve Emilian
&g
Hi Paul,
I'm just wondering what are your latest thoughts about this patch
(http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=14707).
Cheers,
Emil.
> -Original Message-
> From: Medve Emilian
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 10:24 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL P
Hello Paul,
> > Actually I notice that count_relocs is counting all relocs, not just
> > the R_PPC_REL24 ones, which are all that we actually care about in
> > sizing the PLT. And I would be willing to bet that every single
> > R_PPC_REL24 reloc has r_addend == 0.
>
> I'll count only the R_PPC_
Hello Paul,
> Actually I notice that count_relocs is counting all relocs, not just
> the R_PPC_REL24 ones, which are all that we actually care about in
> sizing the PLT. And I would be willing to bet that every single
> R_PPC_REL24 reloc has r_addend == 0.
I'll count only the R_PPC_REL24 and I'
8:34 PM
> To: Medve Emilian
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
> Subject: [RFC/PATCH] reduce load time for modules with lots of relocs
>
> Nathan Lynch wrote:
> > Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1 wrote:
> > >
> > > I have module with 36K relocation entries (I know, I
> know
Hello,
I have module with 36K relocation entries (I know, I know, how could
that be...) and the count_relocs() function takes ~17 seconds to crunch
through the relocation table from the .rela.text section. I don't think
I can reduce the number of entries in the relocation table (can I?) so
I'm th
Hello David,
> No piece of code in the kernel should live in a vacuum.
>
> In order to improve overall code quality, every piece of
> driver code should avoid assuming things about pointer
> sizes and things of this nature.
I'm afraid we might be talking about orthogonal issues here. I actively
Hello David
> It only kills the warning on 32-bit systems, the cast is wrong
> either way.
I'm not aware of the QE being present on any 64-bit PowerPC. However,
porting the entire driver to a 64-bit platform is an exercise in itself
as many other things would need tweaking the QE hardware itself
only.
Cheers,
Emil.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 5:35 PM
> To: Medve Emilian-EMMEDVE1
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gala Kumar-B11780;
> linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [
Hello,
I'm trying to get powerpc to build without block device support
(CONFIG_BLOCK=n). I'm getting the following errors:
CC arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_32.o
In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:17,
from include/linux/ide.h:13,
from arch/powerpc/ke
17 matches
Mail list logo
