Re: Query regarding 2.6.335 RT[Ingo's] and Non-RT performance

2010-08-16 Thread Manikandan Ramachandran
-ID: <4c64352f.4090...@theptrgroup.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > On 08/11/2010 06:18 PM, Manikandan Ramachandran wrote: > > > Hello All, > > >      I created a very simple program which has higher priority than > &

Re: Linuxppc-dev Digest, Vol 72, Issue 63

2010-08-16 Thread Manikandan Ramachandran
1; format=flowed > > On 08/11/2010 06:18 PM, Manikandan Ramachandran wrote: > > Hello All, > > I created a very simple program which has higher priority than > > normal tasks and runs a tight loop. Under same test environment I ran > > this program on both n

Query regarding 2.6.335 RT[Ingo's] and Non-RT performance

2010-08-11 Thread Manikandan Ramachandran
Hello All, I created a very simple program which has higher priority than normal tasks and runs a tight loop. Under same test environment I ran this program on both non-rt and rt 2.6.33.5 kernel. To my suprise I see that performance of non-RT kernel is better than RT. non-RT kernel took 3 sec

RT Kernel crash in SMP mode on Marvell board

2010-07-20 Thread Manikandan Ramachandran
Hello All, I'm trying to bring up a Marvell board [db644xx] with dual CPU[7447A] with kernel 2.6.33.5-rt23[Ingo's RT patch]. For conveniance I have registered IPI interrupt with IRQF_NODELAY flag, all other interrupts are threaded. I'm able to boot up the system fine, however after few hours I