Hi Michael,
Could you share your opinion about this new patch please?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:04 AM Lidong Zhong wrote:
> We noticed the following nuisance messages during boot process
>
> [7.120610][ T1060] vio vio: uevent: failed to send synthetic uevent
> [7.122281]
add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=vio:T%sS%s", vio_dev->type,
cp);
+ else
+ add_uevent_var(env, "MODALIAS=vio:T%s", vio_dev->type);
I think we can avoid some possible regression then. I'll make the change in
my v2 patch.
--
Regards,
Lidong
ion of
modalias in modalias_show(), we remove the return of ENODEV in such cases.
The failure messages can also be suppressed with this change.
v2: keep align the definition of modalias with modalias_show()
Signed-off-by: Lidong Zhong
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed,
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 4:46 PM Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Lidong,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> I'm not an expert on udev etc. so apologies if any of these questions
> are stupid.
>
> Lidong Zhong writes:
> > We have noti
Hi Michael,
Could you share your opinion about this patch please?
Thanks,
Lidong
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 4:47 PM Lidong Zhong wrote:
> We have noticed the following nuisance messages during boot
>
> [7.120610][ T1060] vio vio: uevent: failed to send synthetic uevent
> [
sible
instead of a failure. The above annoying errors can also be removed
after the patch applied.
Signed-off-by: Lidong Zhong
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
b/arch/powerpc
