>> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 14 +-
Acked-by: Len Brown
thanks!
-Len
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
k_idle_wakeup_event() is part of the scheduler.
The scheduler doesn't know what a cpuidle_device is, and
probably should not grow such a dependency.
cheers,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> But this does not seem to come in way of this patch for now.Anyway I
> have added
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Trinabh Gupta wrote:
> From: Len Brown
>
> pm_idle does not scale as an idle handler registration mechanism.
> Don't use it for cpuidle. Instead, call cpuidle directly, and
> allow architectures to use pm_idle as an arch-specific default
&g
w specific issues restricting its use.
> I don't know that there will be any, but it may not be a good idea to prevent
> platforms from requiring the use of multiple "offline" states.
Can you give an example of such restrictions? (I can't)
I do not advocate integrating fe
