Re: [RFC PATCH 03/23] genirq: Introduce IRQF_DELIVER_AS_NMI

2018-06-15 Thread Julien Thierry
Hi Ricardo, On 15/06/18 03:12, Ricardo Neri wrote: On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:06:25AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote: On 13/06/18 09:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:57:23PM -0700, Ricardo

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/23] genirq: Introduce IRQF_DELIVER_AS_NMI

2018-06-13 Thread Julien Thierry
On 13/06/18 10:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote: On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Adding NMI delivery support at low level architecture irq chip level is perfectly fine, but the exposure of that needs to be restricted very much. Adding it to the

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/23] genirq: Introduce IRQF_DELIVER_AS_NMI

2018-06-13 Thread Julien Thierry
On 13/06/18 10:36, Julien Thierry wrote: On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote: On 13/06/18 09:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:57:23PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/23] genirq: Introduce IRQF_DELIVER_AS_NMI

2018-06-13 Thread Julien Thierry
On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote: On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote: On 13/06/18 09:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:57:23PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote: diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h index 5426627..dbc5e02 100644 --- a

Re: [RFC PATCH 03/23] genirq: Introduce IRQF_DELIVER_AS_NMI

2018-06-13 Thread Julien Thierry
I am just asking whether this is a more suitable approach, and if not, is there any suggestions on how to do this? Thanks, -- Julien Thierry

Re: [Patch v10] QE: remove PPCisms for QE

2017-11-01 Thread Julien Thierry
se (ret == 0), otherwise it will be true (ret == 1). */ nit: The comment here is no longer valid, on timeout ret == -EIO and on success 0. It should probably be removed to avoid confusion. Cheers, -- Julien Thierry

Re: [PATCH 1/2] vgaarb: Select a default VGA device even if there's no legacy VGA

2017-10-13 Thread Julien Thierry
On 12/10/17 13:05, Lothar Waßmann wrote: Hi, On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:24:10 +0100 Julien Thierry wrote: Hi Bjorn, On 06/10/17 23:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: From: Bjorn Helgaas Daniel Axtens reported that on the HiSilicon D05 board, the VGA device is behind a bridge that doesn't su

Re: [PATCH 1/2] vgaarb: Select a default VGA device even if there's no legacy VGA

2017-10-13 Thread Julien Thierry
ot device (VGA legacy resources not available)\n"); + vga_set_default_device(pdev); Isn't 'pdev' NULL here? shouldn't it be vgadev->pdev instead? Cheers, -- Julien Thierry