Hi Ricardo,
On 15/06/18 03:12, Ricardo Neri wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:06:25AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote:
On 13/06/18 09:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:57:23PM -0700, Ricardo
On 13/06/18 10:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote:
On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Adding NMI delivery support at low level architecture irq chip level is
perfectly fine, but the exposure of that needs to be restricted very
much. Adding it to the
On 13/06/18 10:36, Julien Thierry wrote:
On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote:
On 13/06/18 09:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:57:23PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux
On 13/06/18 10:20, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Julien Thierry wrote:
On 13/06/18 09:34, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 05:57:23PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 5426627..dbc5e02 100644
--- a
I am just asking whether this is a
more suitable approach, and if not, is there any suggestions on how to
do this?
Thanks,
--
Julien Thierry
se (ret == 0),
otherwise it will be true (ret == 1). */
nit:
The comment here is no longer valid, on timeout ret == -EIO and on
success 0. It should probably be removed to avoid confusion.
Cheers,
--
Julien Thierry
On 12/10/17 13:05, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 12:24:10 +0100 Julien Thierry wrote:
Hi Bjorn,
On 06/10/17 23:24, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
From: Bjorn Helgaas
Daniel Axtens reported that on the HiSilicon D05 board, the VGA device is
behind a bridge that doesn't su
ot device (VGA legacy
resources not available)\n");
+ vga_set_default_device(pdev);
Isn't 'pdev' NULL here? shouldn't it be vgadev->pdev instead?
Cheers,
--
Julien Thierry