On 2013/2/1 10:06, Simon Jeons wrote:
> Hi Jianguo,
> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:57 +0800, Jianguo Wu wrote:
>> On 2013/2/1 9:36, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:32 +0800, Jianguo Wu wrote:
>>>> On 2013/1/31 18:38, Simon Jeons wrote:
>&
On 2013/2/1 9:36, Simon Jeons wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 09:32 +0800, Jianguo Wu wrote:
>> On 2013/1/31 18:38, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Tang,
>>> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:44 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>&g
On 2013/1/31 18:38, Simon Jeons wrote:
> Hi Tang,
> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 17:44 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 01/31/2013 04:48 PM, Simon Jeons wrote:
>>> Hi Tang,
>>> On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 15:10 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>>>
>>> 1. IIUC, there is a button on machine which supports ho
. When removing memory, the page structs of the revmoved memory are filled
>> with 0FD.
>> 2. All page structs are filled with 0xFD on PT/PMD, PT/PMD can be cleared.
>> In this case, the page used as PT/PMD can be freed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki I
memory are filled
> with 0FD.
> 2. All page structs are filled with 0xFD on PT/PMD, PT/PMD can be cleared.
> In this case, the page used as PT/PMD can be freed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu
> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang
>
} else {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +
> + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> + if (pmd_none(*pmd))
> + continue;
> + get_page_bootmem(section_n
ne, I used physical addresses in order to
keep consistent with phys_pud[pmd/pte]_init(), So I think we should keep this.
Thanks,
Jianguo Wu
> So, would you please tell me if we have to use physical addresses here ?
>
> Thanks. :)
>
>> +
>> +for (; start< end; star
Hi Tang,
On 2012/12/7 9:42, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Wu,
>
> I met some problems when I was digging into the code. It's very
> kind of you if you could help me with that. :)
>
> If I misunderstood your code, please tell me.
> Please see below. :)
>
> On 12/03
Hi Tang,
On 2012/12/5 10:07, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Wu,
>
> On 12/04/2012 08:20 PM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
> (snip)
>>>
>>> Seems that we have different ways to handle pages allocated by bootmem
>>> or by regular allocator. Is the checking
Hi Tang,
Thanks for your review and comments, Please see below for my reply.
On 2012/12/4 17:13, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Wu,
>
> Sorry to make noise here. Please see below. :)
>
> On 12/03/2012 10:23 AM, Jianguo Wu wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu
>&g
Hi Congyang,
This is the new version.
Thanks,
Jianguo Wu.
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu
---
include/linux/mm.h |1 +
mm/sparse-vmemmap.c | 231 +++
mm/sparse.c |3 +-
3 files changed, 234 insertions(+), 1
Hi Congyang,
Thanks for your review and comments.
On 2012/11/30 9:45, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 11/28/2012 05:40 PM, Jianguo Wu Wrote:
>> Hi Congyang,
>>
>> I think vmemmap's pgtable pages should be freed after all entries are
>> cleared, I have a patch to do thi
Hi Congyang,
I think vmemmap's pgtable pages should be freed after all entries are cleared,
I have a patch to do this.
The code logic is the same as [Patch v4 09/12] memory-hotplug: remove page
table of x86_64 architecture.
How do you think about this?
Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu
Signed-o
On 2012/11/27 14:49, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 11/27/2012 01:47 PM, Jianguo Wu Wrote:
>> On 2012/11/1 17:44, Wen Congyang wrote:
>>
>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>>>
>>> All pages of virtual mapping in removed memory cannot be freed, since some
>&
diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index fac95f2..ab9d755 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -613,12 +613,13 @@ static inline struct page
> *kmalloc_section_memmap(unsigned long pnum, int nid,
> /* This will make the necessary allocations eventually. */
&g
On 2012/11/1 17:44, Wen Congyang wrote:
> This patch introduces a new function try_offline_node() to
> remove sysfs file of node when all memory sections of this
> node are removed. If some memory sections of this node are
> not removed, this function does nothing.
>
> CC: David Rientjes
> CC: Ji
On 2012/10/23 18:30, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
> When a memory is added, we update zone's and pgdat's start_pfn and
> spanned_pages in the function __add_zone(). So we should revert them
> when the memory is removed.
>
> The patch adds a new function __remove_zone()
node.h:
struct node {
struct sys_device sysdev;
#if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE) && defined(CONFIG_HUGETLBFS)
struct work_struct node_work;
#endif
};
Thanks
Jianguo Wu
> + memset(node_dev, 0, sizeof(struct node));
18 matches
Mail list logo
