On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:24:12AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> And I just confirmed with the Alpha cross-compiler that the fields are
> not 'padded out' if volatile either.
They can't be, struct layout is part of the ABI.
Guess you can introduce say atomic_bool and similar typedefs which would be
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:57:40AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 18:51 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >
> > > Apologies for hijacking this thread but I need to extend this discussion
> > > somewhat regarding what a compiler might do wi
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 05:04:46PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 16:08 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:56 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > static inline void sync(void)
> > > diff --git a/
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 01:08:23PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > - stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
> > - : "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
> > + stw%U1%X1 %L2,%1"
> > + : "=m<>" (*ptep), "=m<>" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
> > : "r" (pte) : "memory");
>
> This
werpc kernel (and fixes one bug where %U was used for
incorrect operand).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelinek
boot/io.h | 12 ++--
include/asm/atomic.h |8
include/asm/io.h |4 ++--
include/asm/pgtable.h |4 ++--
4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 02:26:50PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Unfortunately, a bug in gcc cause it to not quite work either, but that
> is being fixed separately with something around the lines of:
>
> linux-unwind.h:
>
> fs->regs.reg[R_CR2].loc.offset = (long) ®s->ccr - new_cfa;
